Evaluate your story
with AI
Upload your story (PDF, DOCX or TXT, up to 100 pages) or paste a Substack article link or Google Docs document link and receive a detailed evaluation with a grade and up to 10 actionable recommendations.
No card · results in 90 seconds
As seen on…
How it works
- 1. Upload your story
Paste text or upload a file. No sign-up needed.
- 2. Free partial analysis
Get a first impression in seconds.
- 3. Unlock the full analysis
Pay once per project and re-analyse each revision you make.
The narrative demonstrates a genuine voice and solid command of emotional pacing. Atmosphere is handled consistently and transitions between scenes flow naturally. The main challenge lies in the specificity of the central conflict: some key moments remain too implicit, which weakens the impact in the third act. With adjustments to the concreteness of certain passages, the story would have clear editorial potential.
Category breakdown
Line feedback
“The rain made no sound falling; it simply existed, as she had learned to exist at the margins of other people's conversations.”
A poetic image that emotionally anchors the character from the first line. Very effective.
“The detective looked out the window and thought that something was wrong, that things didn't quite add up with the situation.”
Too vague. The reader needs to know what specifically doesn't add up — show, don't tell.
“She walked three blocks north, turned at the pharmacy corner, and entered the building without looking back.”
The action is clear, but the scene's rhythm could benefit from a sensory detail.
“"I know you won't believe me," Marco said, "but I swear the door was open when I got here."”
The dialogue conveys credible doubt without underlining it. The ambiguity works very well here.
Don't think twice
Start now and get actionable feedback on how to improve your story.
No card · results in 90 seconds